|
|
|
Demonstration Farms and Agricultural Advisory Service in Poland
Content
Summary (to top)
The project in Poland was started in July 1994 in two Polish provinces, Elblag and Torun. It entailed co-operation between Polish and Swedish research and advisory organizations over a period of three years.
FULFILLMENT OF OBJECTIVES
OTHER EFFECTS OF IMPLEMENTED ACTIVITIES Contacts have been established between the agricultural organizations in northern Poland and Skine. For example, after the conclusion of the project, meetings were held between the newly formed Polish Chamber of Agriculture and Skine County Agricultural Society (Hushallningssallskapet) which may be of interest in the future.
CONCLUSIONS The concept of the project is sound and it should be spread to other provinces with good agricultural potential. The most important result is that the awareness of the risks of nitrogen and phosphorus pollution of both the local drinking water and the sea has been highlighted, as have the actions which can be taken to minimise the risks. Future projects should place the emphasis on advisory services, trials and training. Actual examples of construction units are needed. With regard to Polish agriculture, the main issue now is that of how to become a competitive force within the European common market. The time is now right to introduce good management practices in order to balance the intensification of the agricultural production in Poland.
Introduction (to top)
The Baltic Agricultural Run-off Action Program (BAAP) in Poland had a total
budget of 3 million SEK and originated in the Helsinki Commission in 1992. The
Agricultural Run-off action programme in Poland was started in July 1994.
Organization of the project (to top) The project was a close co-operation between Swedish an Polish experts. Most of the work in Poland has been carried out by the Polish experts from organizations on national, provincial and community level. The Swedish experts have participated in the planning of the activities, suggested methods of sampling and analysis and participated in training of both scientific personnel and advisors in different techniques and topics. A list of addresses is found in Appendix 1.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Elblag |
Torun |
Poland |
|
| Nitrogen fertiliser use |
59 kg N/ha |
99 kg N/ha |
46 kg N/ha |
| Nitrogen balance |
24 % |
14 % |
|
| Phosphorous fertiliser use |
5 kg P/ha |
8 kg P/ha |
3 kg P/ha |
| Phosphorous balance |
39 % |
18 % |
Source: Own calculations based in information from "Participation of BAAP Project in Abating the Water Pollution in Gmina Ciechocin", "Proceedings of Conference" by A. Sapek., Przysiek, 1997.
Elblag
The demonstration farms in Elblag are situated in the Zulawy, an area partly
below the sea level. It is mainly arable land, divided into polders drained by
an old network of channels. The alluvial soils are very fertile, mainly clay and
silt with patches of muck peat.
During the communist time around 50% of the land belonged to state farms (PGR)
but most of this land has now been sold to private farmers. The area has not
reached the potential productivity in the field of agriculture. The average farm
area is today about 12 - 15 hectares.
The main production is milk and grain, mainly winter crops. Permanent leys cover
2,5 % of the farm land. Most farmers have a mixed production of dairy cows and
commercial crops. The average animal density in Zulawy decreased during the
transition period from around 60 cows per 100 hectares but is slowly rising
again. The recommendation to the farmers is to plan the farm investments for
around 30 cows/100 hectares considering a certain increase in milk production
from today's 4,000 kg milk/year. Slurry is practically non-existent, farm yard
manure is stored on the ground and very few farms have storage facilities for
the animal urine. Nearly all farms in the region have municipal water but other
infrastructure is poor. Telephones do not exist in the rural areas and the roads
are in a bad condition. There is a general awareness of the necessity to improve
the situation including the environmental conditions, particularly the local
drinking water quality.
It was a considerable problem during the project that most of the demonstration
farmers had no definite ideas of the future size and composition of their animal
herds and there were a lot of changes regarding the size and type as well as the
placing of the manure and silage stores during the project time.
Torun
The demonstration farms are situated in the community (gmina) of Ciechocin, within the watershed of the river Drweca which drains into the river Struga Ciechocinska and thereafter in Wisla. There are good natural conditions in the province and agriculture in the form of private farms has traditionally been and still is the main industry. The soils are weathered, mainly sandy-foamy soils. The depth of the soils can be as much as several hundred meters. The landscape is undulating and the rivers create ravines and cause problems with soil erosion. The groundwater level is normally around 10 m below the surface.
The average size of a farm is 10 hectares, most farmers have mixed production
of dairy cows, pigs and crops. Grain dominates the crop production but most
farms also grow potatoes and sugar beets. The animal density is around 40
cows/100 ha and 20 pigs/100 ha, the average milk production is 2,900 kg/year.
Some farms - in the community of Chiechocin nearly all farms - have municipal
water. The environmental problems have been given great attention by the local
authorities. Single household sewage treatment plants are being subsidized by
the community on many farms and communal sewage treatment plants are under
construction. The infrastructure is good although telephones hardly exist in the
rural areas.
Activities and results (to top)
CONSTRUCTIONS ON THE DEMONSTRATION FARMS
The main interest of manure handling in the two project areas has been solid manure systems. Hardly any farm has a slurry system. This is due to tradition, higher investment costs for a slurry system and legal restrictions for slurry handling. For the first time a government regulation has been suggested for manure and urine storage capacity, spreading times and required area of farm land for animal production. There is no current regulation in this field.
The main objectives of this part of the project were:
to demonstrate proper manure, urine and slurry storage and handling
systems
| to demonstrate adequate silage storage and silage run-off collection
| to demonstrate suitable methods of household sewage treatment. | |
Constructions on demonstration farms should serve as "prototypes"
of the constructions at other farms. The restrictions concerning maximum allowed
animal densities were based on Swedish recommendations. Eight months storage
capacity was required for dairy cows and ten moths for pigs. The silage juice
should be collected. When designing buildings and manure/urine storage
facilities in the Elblag area the relatively high ground water table in the area
must be considered.
On some of the farms other demonstration constructions were built as a Polish
contribution to the project, for example waste water treatment plants and in
some case manure or urine tanks which could not be covered by the project. The
source of finance was the Fund for Environmental Protection in Torun. The
construction on the demonstration farms are shown in table 2.
TABLE 2. Constructions on the demonstration farms.
|
Farmer |
Constructions planned |
Financed by BAAP |
Other source of finance |
Remarks |
| Jan Banacki, Sofia Banacka |
Manure slab | design, supervision, materials | the farmer | construction complete |
| Urine tank | design, supervision, materials | the farmer | construction complete | |
| Andrzej Siwon | Manure slab | design, supervision, materials | the farmer | construction complete |
| Urine tank | design, supervision, materials | the farmer | construction complete | |
| Cezary Wiecorek | Slurry tank | design, excavation | the farmer | production not decided construction stopped |
| Tade Skrzypinski | - |
- |
production not decided | |
| Woijciech Boniecki | Slurry/urine tank | design, supervision, materials | Province of Torun, the farmer | construction complete |
| Manure pad | the farmer | construction complete | ||
| Waste water plant | part of materials | Province of Torun, the farmer | construction complete | |
| Krzysztof Gasiorowski | Waste water plant | part of materials | Province of Torun, the farmer | construction complete |
| Manure slab |
- |
stopped animal prod. | ||
| Urine tank |
- |
stopped animal prod. | ||
| Wiadyslaw Grzebski | Manure slab | supervision, materials | the farmer | construction complete |
| Urine tank | supervision, materials | the farmer | construction complete | |
| Silage silo | materials | Province of Torun, the farmer | construction complete | |
| Waste water plant |
- |
Province of Torun, the farmer | construction complete | |
| Ryszard Kukowski | Manure slab | materials | the farmer | enlargement of existing, construction complete |
| Urine/slurry tank | design, materials | the farmer | construction complete | |
| Waste water plant |
- |
Province of Torun, the farmer | construction complete | |
| Silage silo | design, materials | the farmer | construction complete | |
| Wieslaw Gutmanski | Manure slab | materials | the farmer | construction complete |
| Urine tank |
- |
Province of Torun, the farmer | construction complete | |
| Waste water plant | design, materials | Province of Torun, the farmer | construction complete |
In Torun the constructions were built as planned. In Elblag only two of four
farmers could go through with the plans. Many farmers in this area, previously
dominated by state farms, are reluctant to invest in new production capacity.
The constructions were, as far as could be judged, of good quality but a lot
larger than the farmers would have built them mainly due to the required storage
time of 8 - 10 months. This was a difficult aspect to introduce and the reaction
of neighboring farmers and other visitors is that the constructions are too
expensive to copy unless there are government subsidies. One obvious solution is
to build smaller constructions, something which can not be recommended by the
project but which should be expected to happen.
TESTING OF SOIL AND WATER ON FARM LEVEL
The water quality was tested on the demonstration farms in order to establish the pollution from manure storage and other sources. Three permanent sampling points were used on each farm and samples were taken once a month. The points were:
near the manure pit;
| further away from the manure pit;
| in a small stream on the farm or nearby. | |
Sampling started in September 1995 in Elblag and in March 1997 in Torun. Soil samples were taken in 20 cm layers of the profile near the water sampling points.
The assessment of soil and water quality was also a form of farmer education.
The farmer was participating in the investigations on his farm which enabled him
to understand the impact of the farm activity on environment and the importance
of improved practices. The results from measurements on the demonstration farms
are used as educational materials for training on different levels also after
the project.
Naturally the highest nutrients concentrations were found in ground water
samples sampled from control wells near the manure storage area on the
farmstead. A serious water pollution nitrate and phosphorous was also observed
in old wells no more used for drinking water. The concentration of N-NO 3 ranged
from 7.6 to 34.7 mg N/dm3, and phosphorus from 0.049 to 0.89 mg P/dm3. The
Polish standard for drinking water is maximum 10 mg/dm3 nitrate. It was
demonstrated that the permanent grassland along the streams is an efficient trap
to surplus of soil nitrate and protects the stream from pollution.
Generally the conclusion of the measurements on the farms is that the farm wells
can not be used for drinking water due to high nitrate concentration which in
turn is due to improper manure storage.
MONITORING OF THE RIVER STRUGA CECHOCINSKA
The local Laboratory for Environmental Protection in Torun monitored the small river Struga Ciechocinska, in which basin the demonstration farms are located by monthly sampling at five points. The monitoring started in January 1995 and will be continued. All relevant parameters including flow (ml/s) are measured.
The results of monitoring of Struga Ciechocinska showed that the water was relatively clean and was polluted with nitrate only in few cases. The concentration of phosphorus was, however, high. The results are presented in table 3.
TABLE 3. Concentration of nitrate nitrogen, total nitrogen and total phosphorous in the river Struga Ciechocinska.
The measuring points are identified as the distance downstream from the village Miliszeuy. It should be observed that the results from 1997 are only include as far as April.
|
Nitrate nitrogen N-NO3 mg/dM3 |
Total nitrogen N mg/dM3 |
Total phosphorous P mg/dm3 |
||||
|
average |
min-max |
average |
min-max |
average |
min-max |
|
| 0,4 km - 1995 |
2,42 |
0,1 - 6,3 |
4,0 |
1,5 - 8,1 |
0,22 |
0,10 - 0,52 |
| 0,4 km - 1996 |
1,l |
0,3 - 2,2 |
2,9 |
1,7 - 5,3 |
0,28 |
0,13 - 0,62 |
| 0,4 km - 1997 |
1,5 |
0,8 - 2,1 |
3,1 |
1,8 - 4,4 |
0,19 |
0,1 - 0,3 |
| 1,5 km - 1995 |
3,9 |
0,2 - 10,8 |
4,4 |
1,6 - 12,2 |
2,16 |
0,16 - 22,0 |
| 1,5 km - 1996 |
1,3 |
0,1 - 3,9 |
3,7 |
0,9 - 13,1 |
0,55 |
0,09 - 3,50 |
| 1,5 km - 1997 |
3,4 |
1,0 - 5,5 |
5,0 |
2,2 - 7,0 |
0,27 |
0,17 - 0,36 |
| 1,7 km - 1995 |
1,96 |
0,1 - 4,9 |
3,85 |
0,2 - 8,1 |
0,26 |
0,11 - 0,82 |
| 1,7 km - 1996 |
0,4 |
0,1 - 1,0 |
2,6 |
1,6 - 4,6 |
0,34 |
0,12 - 0,75 |
| 1,7 km - 1997 |
0,9 |
0,3 - 1,6 |
2,3 |
1,1 - 3,8 |
0,17 |
0,05 - 0,26 |
| 6,1 km - 1995 |
3,0 |
0,1 - 10,2 |
4,8 |
0,1 - 12,1 |
0.22 |
0,08 - 0,52 |
| 6,1 km - 1996 |
0,7 |
0,1 - 2.0 |
2,7 |
1,2 - 4,8 |
0,21 |
0,07 - 0,56 |
| 6,1 km - 1997 |
2,0 |
0,1 - 2,8 |
4.3 |
2,9 - 5,2 |
0,19 |
0,06 - 0,42 |
| 9,5 km - 1995 |
4,5 |
0,l - 11,5 |
6,5 |
2,1 - 13,4 |
0,16 |
0,07 - 0,47 |
| 9,5 km - 1996 |
0,9 |
0,2 - 2,9 |
2.8 |
1,0 - 4,9 |
0,16 |
0,07 - 0,25 |
| 9,5 km - 1997 |
2.6 |
2.4 - 2,9 |
4,7 |
4,3 - 4,9 |
0,33 |
0,08 - 0,84 |
It is interesting to compare the monitoring results from Struga Ciechocinska
with results from rivers in Skane, the southernmost province of Sweden, which
has similar natural conditions.
Compared with the level of pollution reported for all the main rivers of Skane (Lansstyrelsen
in Malmohus lan, Miljovardsprogram for Skane 1995) it is clear the Struga
Ciechocinska would fall in highest class of pollution of nitrogen and
phosphorous. However the Struga Ciechocinska is further away from the sea and
generally the concentration of phosphorous and nitrogen decreases as the small
rivers draining the intensive agricultural areas flow into larger river systems.
This is the case in Torun province as shown by measurements in the larger river
Drweca (B. Sapek 1997).
AMMONIA EMISSION MEASUREMENTS
The Swedish method for ammonia measurement developed by Dr Martin Ferm was
introduced and tested by the Polish specialists in 1996 and 1997. The main
purpose at this initial stage was to demonstrate to the advisors, and to a
certain extent also to farmers, that nitrogen losses from manure storage exist.
The technique of ammonia measurements is rather new also in Sweden.
The preliminary study of ammonia emissions from manure storage places in farms
in Elblag province showed that, depending on condition the emission was between
130 and 978 g of NH3 per 24 hours. This could be approximated to an emission of
50 to 360 kg ammonia per year.
Torun together with Leszczyn provinces has the highest animal density in the
country and can therefore be expected to have a degree of ammonia emission
estimated to around 35 - 40 kg/ha. The animal density in Elblag decreased with
the fall of the agricultural co-operatives and ammonia emission has been
estimated to around 10 - 20 kg/ha (A. Sapek 1997)
ADVISORY SERVICE
The advisory activities are listed in table 4. The general idea to work through the existing advisory organizations was a successful approach. The objective of the advisory part of the project was of course to spread knowledge to the farmers but also to develop the advisory system.
TABLF 4. Advisory activities in the project.
|
Activity |
1994/95 |
1995/96 |
1996/97 |
|||
|
Elblag |
Torun |
Elblag |
Torun |
Elblag |
Torun |
|
| Crop and feed plans |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
| Nutrition balance on farms |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
| Demonstration trials |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
| Field days |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
| Study tour to Sweden |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
| Analysis of fodder |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
| Analysis of soil |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
| Analysis of manure |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|
The individual advisory program
The intention was that the organizations responsible for advisory work (ODR in Torun and IMUZ together with the Zulawy Development Bureau in Elblag) should initiate an individual advisory programme for the demonstration farmers including:
crop planning,
| analyzing of soil, manure and fodder,
| field days with neighboring farmers. | |
Simultaneously the ideas from the project should be used in the general
advisory programme.
The advisors and demonstration farmers visited Sweden and studied all aspects of
animal and crop production including feeding, ley and fodder production, manure
storage and spreading technique. The programme also included visits to an
agricultural laboratory, agricultural research centers, ecological farms and
additional farm enterprises. The study tours were much appreciated and created a
common work platform for the experts involved in the project.
Basically the Swedish experience from individual advisory work was implemented.
Eventually and as a whole there was a good response to this way of working with
individual farmers but it took quite a lot of discussions and visits. The
individual advisory work requires more or less constant contact and discussion
between the advisor and the farmer and it is important that the theoretical
competence and the practical agricultural experience have equal status in the
discussions. To some extent Swedish information material concerning crop
planning, manure handling and fodder production was translated and used in the
advisory work but mainly Polish material was used. A Danish computerized program
for crop planning was introduced in Torun.
The general advisory programme
The general advisory programme was carried out as field days for field advisors often at community (gmina) level and farmers. Both the advisors and the farmers were enthusiastic about the field days and it was quite obvious to all involved that a lot of discussion among farmers was initiated during these occasions. There was however a tendency that the advisors would squeeze in too many subjects on one field day; crop fertilization, plant protection, animal feeding, hay making, manure handling etc. It would probably have been better to concentrate on a few subjects each time. The activities are reported in table 8 under the training activities.
Demonstration trials
The objectives of the trials were demonstration of:
efficient use of farm manure;
| efficient ley production;
| reduced use of agricultural chemicals;
| economical plant production. | |
The demonstration trials on the farms were planned jointly buy the Swedish and Polish advisors and the work was carried out by the farmers. The choice was to make demonstration trials rather than scientific trials in order to make efficient use of the funds available. However as the project was going it became clear that there is also a need for scientific trials in the area of environmental aspects of agriculture as well as a need to improve the communication of results of trials carried out by different organizations in different parts of the country. There are and have been a lot of field trials in Poland for testing new varieties, mineral fertilizers and pesticides but not much has been done with manure. The normal spreading time of manure in Poland is in the autumn and manure is very much regarded as a useless waste product.
The demonstration trials were difficult to organize due to different opinions of the Swedish and Polish advisors concerning what should be demonstrated. There was a certain resistance towards the idea of replacing fertilizer with manure and these trials were realized only after a strong pressure from the Swedish side. However the possibility to make good use of manure and reduce the use of mineral fertilizer interested the farmers. The trials were visited by advisors from All over the country, by persons involved in different agricultural projects and by agricultural schools. Some demonstration trials were shown for up to 1 500 persons within one year.
TRAINING ACTIVITIES
The training was done for two levels; expert level and a more practical
level. The training on expert level was intended for advisors, teachers, and
persons from non-governmental organizations. The training on practical level was
directed mainly towards farmers and field advisors but also to administrators
especially on community level (gmina leaders). Some of the training occasions
however had participants from all categories.
The objective of the training was to create an understanding for the
environmental problems of agriculture among specialists and administrators and
present practical solutions to farmers and advisors. By initiating a discussion
among the former the project would contribute to the legislation process in
Poland which has recently been initiated by the parliament.
Training of advisors, teachers and persons from non-governmental organizations
A special training programme was organized as a result of an agreement with the Ministry of Science, Education and Extension, the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Economy and two other international projects dealing with agricultural environmental issues; Poland Agriculture and Water Quality Protection (PAWQP) and Environment- Agricultural Project Poland (EAPP) realized in Poland by The Iowa State University and The Danish Agricultural Advisory Center respectively. The training could thereby be extended to include the provinces Torufi, Elblag, Szczecin, Ostroleka, Koszalin and Bydgoszcz, all in the north of Poland. The training was mainly organized by IMUZ and most of the lectures were held by Polish experts. The Swedish experts participated in the planning and lecturing. Experts from Ukraine, Belarus and Lithuania were invited to present certain topics.
Each training session was divided into three coursers. The tides and duration of the courses were:
General problems connected with impact of agriculture on water quality,
three days;
| Problems connected with impact of plant production on water quality, three
days;
| Problems connected with impact of animal husbandry and rural domestic
wastes on water quality, three days. | |
Altogether there were three such training sessions during the project, all of nine days totally, held at ODR Sielinko in Stettin province. Altogether 96 persons from six provinces in northern Poland participated. The total number of participant days was 864.
Training of farmers, advisors and administrators
This training was done in co-operation with the communities (gminas), provincial governments of Torun and Elblag and non-governmental organizations and the programme was developed as the project was proceeding. The topics varied due to the interest of the actual group involved. The activities and participants are presented in table 5.
TABLE 5. Training organized in co-operation.
|
Place |
time |
duration |
no of participants per day |
topic |
participants |
|
1995 |
|||||
| Przysiek |
March |
2 days |
52 |
water pollution from agriculture | farmers, advisors, gmina activists |
| Przysiek |
April |
2 days |
40 |
water pollution from agriculture | teachers and advisors |
| Ciechocin |
May |
1 day |
40 |
application of pesticides | farmers |
|
1996 |
|||||
| Elblag |
March |
5 days |
32 |
best management practices, crop plans | farmers, advisors |
| Elblag |
July |
I day |
22 |
manure and slurry technology | farmers |
| Ciecochin |
July |
1 day |
34 |
manure and slurry technology, sprayers | farmers |
|
1997 |
|||||
| Stare Pole |
February |
1 day |
160 |
farmers, advisors | |
| Elblag |
April |
1 day |
25 |
manure technology | farmers, advisors |
| Ciechocin |
April |
1 day |
several |
field trials | farmers, advisors |
| Ciechocin |
April |
1 day |
several |
field trials | farmers, advisors |
| Ciechocin |
May |
1 day |
several |
field trials | farmers, advisors |
| Elblag, Torun |
June |
3 days |
68 |
manure technology, general agricultural environmental problems | farmers, advisors, provincial administrators |
The Regional Center for Ecological Education in Przysiek
| The Regional Committee of Rural Youth Association in Torun
| The Agency for Reconstruction of Agriculture
| World Day of Environment Protection, Torun | |
Experience from training activities
The seminars were perhaps more theoretical than oriented towards practical problems on the farm. On the other hand this is not easy since not so many advisors have started working with environmental aspects on farm level. For the same reason the seminars about manure handling were based very much on Swedish practical experience but nevertheless much appreciated by the participants. However this was an experience that needs to be discussed by similar projects in the future.
INFORMATION MATERIAL
Lectures from training, particularly Sielinko seminars, have been printed in an edition form of "Education Notebook", each in 1000 copies. The edition of notebooks was partly sponsored by the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Economy. The copies were handed to the participants of training, to ODRs and to selected teachers in 300 Agricultural Secondary Schools and to some policy makers.
Four notebooks have been edited till now:
7 lectures on 104 pages; sponsored by Ministry (80%) and BAAP (20%)
| 7 lectures on 84 pages; sponsored by BAAP (50%) and Ministry (50%)
| 8 lectures on I24 pages; sponsored by BAAP (50%) and Ministry (50%)
| (in press) - 7 lectures; sponsored by BAAP (50%) and Ministry (50%) | |
The methods of proper management systems in farm was propagated by means of brochures edited in interesting form and aimed to the farmers. Each brochure was printed in 1000 colored copies. Copies are handed to farmers through ODR advisers. The brochures were:
Manure storage and handling and protection of water quality - sponsored by
BAAP (50%) and Ministry (50%);
| How the losses of ammonia from storage and handling can be lessened -
sponsored by BAAP (100%). | |
Advisory material like Forms for Crop Plans, Nutritional Balance on farm level and Farm Report Books were printed in Polish.
Suggestions for the future (to top)
Future projects should emphasize advisory service, trials and training more
than constructions even if there is a need for some practical results to gather
around for field days and seminar field trips. The control of the advisory and
demonstration activities in the provinces including the construction of storage
facilities could be more decentralized in order to give the local advisors more
responsibility and speed up the communication. The training works very well with
the current organization. It would also be possible to include other
environmental aspects like the use of sewage sludge. Currently a sewage
treatment plant is being built for the city of Torun and the Governor has
expressed interest in the Swedish experience from the use of sludge on farm
land.
Basically the concept of the project is a good one and it ought to be spread to
other provinces with a good future potential for agriculture. It is obvious that
for Polish agriculture the main issue at the moment is how to become competitive
on the common European market. There is no doubt that this will mean generally
more intensive production both of animals and crops in Poland. The time is right
to introduce good agricultural management to balance this intensification.
MEMBERS OF THE EXPERT TEAM AND OTHER PERSONS ASSOCIATED TO THE PROJECT (to top)
IMUZ/Bydgoszcz
ODR/Przysiek
ODR/Przysiek/Gmina Ciechocin and Golub-Dobrzyn
|
|